Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 391 S.W.3d 86
  • 2012 WL 5232147
  • 2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no abuse of discretion where trial court considered statutory factors and State proved a violation of probation conditions
  • providing that article 42.037(h) requires neither that the trial court render findings nor that revocations be conditioned on the quantity or quality of evidence adduced as to the enumerated factors
  • applying version of restitution statute that was effective “when the trial court entered -appéllant’s original restitution order”
  • “[A] party need not spout ‘magic words’ or recite a specific statute to preserve an issue[,]” as long as the basis of his complaint is evident to the trial court.”
  • “a party “need not spout ‘magic words’” to preserve an issue for appellate review
  • A party does not have to use “magic words” or recite a specific statute to preserve an issue, “as long as the basis of his complaint is evident to the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.