Skip to main content

Lopez v. State

Citations

  • 253 S.W.3d 680
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 642
  • 2008 WL 2081616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that extraneous offenses to which defendant had admitted guilt in prior prosecution were not prior convictions for purpose of impeachment in subsequent prosecution
  • holding that extraneous offenses to which defendant had admitted guilt in prior prosecution were not prior convictions for purpose of impeachment in subsequent prosecution
  • holding that extraneous offenses to which defendant had admitted guilt in prior prosecution were not prior convictions for purpose of impeachment in subsequent prosecution
  • holding that to preserve error “an objection must be made each time inadmissible evidence is offered unless the complaining party obtains a running objection or obtains a ruling on his complaint in a hearing outside the presence of the jury”
  • emphasizing that objection must be made each time inadmissible evidence is offered “unless the complaining party obtains a running objection”
  • holding trial judge made at least an implied ruling permitting the State to elicit testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.