Skip to main content

Yates v. Yates

Citations

  • 963 A.2d 535
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 296
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4375
  • 2008 WL 5413489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the father’s claim that the trial court improperly delegated its judicial decision-making authority to a court-appointed parenting coordinator
  • remanding a custody order where “the trial court’s incorporation of . . . unidentified terms . . . createfd] unnecessary uncertainty”
  • finding father’s argument waived for failure to include it in Rule 1925(b) statement
  • court reasonably exercised its discretion in appointing parenting coordinator in custody matter where parents’ relationship was “highly destructive, inflammatory[,] and hostile”
  • “As this argument was not raised in Father's Rule 1925(b) statement, it is waived.”
  • claims not included in the Rule 1925(b) statement are waived for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Panella, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Yates v. Yates

37 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.