Yates v. Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that if a sale is “manifestly to the advantage of the parties,” the property must be sold
• reflecting on the “statutory and inherent right to adjust the equities and settle claims between or among the parties” that is possessed by the courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parker v. Lambert
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-04-10· cited 47×
• Kimura v. Kamalo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-02-23· cited 20×
• Allison v. Hagan
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2006-06-23· cited 8×
• Gober v. Burrus
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-12-17· cited 3×
• Lasonya Morrow v. Ray Anthony McClain
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-08-29
• Elma Lou Hale v. Gerald D. Hale
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-03-04
• Emma Lou Hale v. Gerald D. Hale and Bonnie F. Hale
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2009-07-10
• Joseph P. Rusnak v. Gail Phebus
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2008-05-29
• Joann Potts v. Walter Ansel Rogers, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-09-09
• Nancy Crawford v. Roger Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-11-14
• Connie McGahey v. James Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-07-17
• Teresa Miles v. Earl Pace
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-07-31
• Joseph Canepari v. George Summers
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-07-14
• Commercial Credit v. Est. of Arthur Smith
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-06-12
• Sallie Lunn Tarver v. John Taylor Tarver
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2019-03-13
• Taylor Brocato (now Dunn) v. Kyle Young
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2024-01-02