Wiseman v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts should be “reluctant to disturb custody arrangements which have satisfactorily served the best interests of the child.”
• stating that the determining factor in a custody determination may be one parent’s role as primary caregiver
• Court rejected alternating week custody schedule for 15-month-old child as too disruptive and destabilizing to child who was too young to voice his discomfort with it.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).