Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excusing vague Rule 1925(b) statement where defendants had filed preliminary objections seeking dismissal on multiple different independent grounds and court’s order simply stated that it sustained the preliminary objections
• declining to remand to the trial court for preparation of an opinion that describes its rationale for the order under appeal for reasons of judicial economy, where the parties have thoroughly argued the legal issues upon which the case must be resolved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).