Yates v. Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Wherein the court reasoned that because the primary cause of action, adultery, was pending when the reconventional demand based on living separate and apart was filed, the trial court should have considered both the principal and reconventional demands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ogea v. Ogea
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1980-01-28· cited 16×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCaa v. McCaa
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1964-06-26· cited 24×
• Malone v. Malone
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-01-17· cited 18×
• Jones v. Floyd
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-06-18· cited 10×
• Perry v. Perry
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1968-03-04· cited 7×
• Thomason v. Thomason
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1977-10-26· cited 6×
• Kinchen v. Kinchen
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1962-12-14· cited 4×