Skip to main content

James v. Faust

Citations

  • 62 V.I. 554
  • 2015 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reemphasizing the importance of the best-interests standard that has guided this Court’s family-law jurisprudence
  • “ ‘[MJeaningful review ... is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.’ ” (quoting In re Q.G., 60 V.I. 654, 660 (V.I. 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named James v. Faust

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.