James v. Faust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Wetherbe had not alleged that defendants in the previous action were aware of any of his public speech
• allegations that defendant “was aware of [the alleged] speech” and “that it motivated his actions” are “requirements of [a] claim for First Amendment retaliation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).