Nevada Supreme Court· 3/31/1987

Yates v. State

Citations

734 P.2d 1252
103 Nev. 200
1987 Nev. LEXIS 1607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that reversible misconduct occurred when an attorney called the expert witness's testimony \`m[a]larkey'\ and \`outright fraud'\
holding that reversible misconduct occurred when an attorney called the expert witness’s testimony “ ‘m[a]larkey’ ” and “ ‘outright fraud’ ”
holding that reversible misconduct occurred when an attorney called the expert witness's testimony \`m[a]larkey'\ and \`outright fraud'\
concluding that it is clearly improper for the prosecutor to transform into an unsworn witness during final argument
concluding that it is clearly improper for the prosecutor to transform into an unsworn witness during final argument
concluding that it is improper for the prosecutor to transform into an unsworn witness during 4 final argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Mowbray, Springer, Steffen, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.