Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 800 P.2d 175
  • 106 Nev. 713
  • 1990 Nev. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is improper to ask the jury to vote in favor of future victims and against the defendant
  • observing that trial counsel's strategic or tactical decisions are \[v]irtually unchallengeable absent extraordinary circumstances\
  • \improper to ask the jury to vote in favor of future victims and against a defendant\
  • “improper to ask the jury to vote in favor of future victims and against a defendant”
  • \Tactical decision are virtually unchallengeable absent extraordinary circumstances.\
  • \Tactical decision are virtually unchallengeable absent extraordinary circumstances.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Steffen, Young, Springer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.