Skip to main content

Santillanes v. State

Citations

  • 765 P.2d 1147
  • 104 Nev. 699
  • 1988 Nev. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury could infer defendant’s consciousness of guilt based upon prosecutor’s comments regarding defendant’s failure to attend meetings with the police
  • holding that evidence which shows consciousness of guilt is admissible
  • determining that a jury may reasonably infer the defendant's consciousness of guilt from the defendant's conduct of failing to attend a previously agreed-upon meeting with police
  • admitting in a criminal case the results of a blood enzyme identification test into evidence, which had resulted in only two errors in over 1,100 trials
  • sufficient documentation of reliability and criticism of test goes to credibility, not admissibility
  • sufficient documentation of reliability and criticism of test goes to credibility, not admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunderson, Steffen, Young, Springer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.