Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 803 P.2d 1104
  • 106 Nev. 924
  • 1990 Nev. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prosecutorial statement that a defense witness is a liar is not proper argument
  • holding that a prosecutorial statement that a defense witness is a liar is not a proper argument
  • holding that a prosecutorial statement that a defense witness is a liar is not a proper argument
  • stating that it is improper argument to characterize a witness as a liar
  • “A prosecutor may demonstrate to a jury through inferences from the record that a defense witness’s testimony is palpably untrue.”
  • although demonstrating bias on the part of the witness is permissible, stating that the witness is lying is not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.