Skip to main content

Bennett v. State

Citations

  • 901 P.2d 676
  • 111 Nev. 1099
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that technical rnisstatements of evidence did not infect the trial with unfairness sufficient to result in a due process violation
  • observing that even if jurors unanimously find there are no mitigating circumstances sufficient to outweigh the aggravating circumstances, they \still ha[ve] the discretion to return a penalty other than death\
  • holding the jury's imposition of a death sentence to be discretionary
  • holding the jury’s imposition of a death sentence to be discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.