Skip to main content

Miranda v. State

Citations

  • 707 P.2d 1121
  • 101 Nev. 562
  • 1985 Nev. LEXIS 468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court can admit a prior inconsistent SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 4134. statement for both impeachment and substantive purposes
  • court will review for “fundamental error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steffen, Zenoff, Springer, Mowbray, Gunderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.