Skip to main content

Gray v. State

Citations

  • 957 N.E.2d 171
  • 2011 Ind. LEXIS 1014
  • 2011 WL 5865244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the evidence was sufficient to find the defendant constructively possessed marijuana
  • holding evidence was sufficient to support finding defendant constructively possessed marijuana when bag of marijuana was found underneath a coffee table in a common room
  • stating that a defendant’s proximity to contraband in plain view supports an inference of intent to maintain dominion or control if the contraband’s incriminating character is immediately apparent
  • stating the list is “not exhaustive as other circumstances could just as reasonably demonstrate requisite knowledge”
  • explaining that the “hornbook law of Indiana Trial Rule 50(A
  • finding sufficient evidence that defendant constructively possessed marijuana found under a Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-2539 | April 15, 2020 Page 14 of 20 coffee table in a common room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker, David

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.