State v. Salmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly allowed factual entrapment questions to be determined by jury
• concluding testimony was not hearsay when it was offered, “not to prove the truth of what [the informant] said to defendants, but rather to show that [the informant] had made statements which induced defendants to commit the offense”
• concluding testimony was not hearsay when it was offered, ‚not to prove the truth of what [the informant] said to defendants, but rather to show that [the informant] had made statements which induced defendants to commit the offense‛

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).