Tenth Circuit· 8/17/2001

Woodward v. Williams

Citations

263 F.3d 1135
57 Fed. R. Serv. 909
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18571
2001 WL 946452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that lack of knowledge of state court decision may provide basis for equitable tolling when prisoner acts diligently
holding that state court “correctly found that Deborah’s state- ments to Butler and Maggart fall within the excited-utterance exception”
concluding that the victim’s statement, “He is going to kill me,” related to the startling event of the appellant intruding into her house and shoving her father, and that the statement was properly admitted under the excited utterance exception
recognizing two issues on appeal and upholding the New Mexico Supreme Court on the issue of exited utterance but reversing in part the defendant’s federal statute of limitations claim
recognizing two issues on appeal and upholding the New Mexico Supreme Court on the issue of exited utterance but reversing in part the defendant’s federal statute of limitations claim
remanding on equitable tolling issue despite eleven-month delay between date conviction became final and date of state petition for post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Woodward v. Williams

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.