Burger v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that applications “challenging the execution of a state sentence under § 2241 are subject to a one-year period of limitations.”
• holding that this court reviews a district court decision on equitable tolling for abuse of discretion
• holding that this court reviews a district court decision on equitable tolling for abuse of discretion
• explaining that “Oklahoma imposes no time limits for filing applications for post-conviction relief in [its] district courts”
• explaining that “Oklahoma imposes no time limits for filing applications for post-conviction relief in [its] district courts”
• explaining that “claims raised in § 2241 petitions must be exhausted before a federal court will hear them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).