United States v. Debra A. Hartmann, Kenneth K. Kaenel, and John Scott Korabik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not commit plain error by admitting as an excited utterance the victim's statement to his lawyers that his wife and her lover were planning to kill him
• finding no plain error in admission of victim’s statements of fear of the defendant in order to support prosecution’s theory of the case
• finding no plain error in admission of victim's statements of fear of the defendant in order to support prosecution's theory of the case
• finding no error where “the prosecution argued that certain statements were lies, not that the attorneys were liars”
• finding that a decedent's statement of intention to change the beneficiaries of his life insurance policy was admissible under Rule 803(3) and could show that defendants had' a motive to kill him before he made the change
• finding no error where “the prosecution argued that certain statements were lies, not that the 11 attorneys were liars”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).