Skip to main content

Echols v. State

Citations

  • 722 N.E.2d 805
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 12
  • 2000 WL 46045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “a trial court [is not] required to find mitigating circumstances where there are none[.]”
  • reiterating that “sentencing decisions lie within the discretion of the trial court,” which include the trial court’s use or non-use of aggravators and mitigators
  • “Echols correctly recites the law regarding the necessity of a jury instruction on specific intent in an attempted murder case. . . . There is no comparable requirement for the murder charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Rucker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.