Indiana Supreme Court· 2/7/2001
Dill v. State
Citations
- 741 N.E.2d 1230
- 2001 Ind. LEXIS 80
- 2001 WL 102309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a reasonable jury could not properly have acquitted the defendant and would have rendered a guilty verdict even if the erroneous flight instruction had not been given and holding that the instruction error did not require reversal
- “although evidence of flight may, under appropriate circumstances, be relevant, admissible, and a proper subject for counsel’s closing argument, it does not follow that a trial court should give a discrete instruction highlighting such evidence[]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-10-13· cited 330×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-06· cited 236×
- Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 128×
- Drakkar R. Willis v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 98×
- Kevin Charles Isom v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-05-20· cited 80×
- Michael Inman v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-02-11· cited 75×
- Wayne A. Campbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-10-30· cited 66×
- Derrick Weedman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-26· cited 62×
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-28· cited 53×
- Gravens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-11-03· cited 52×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-20· cited 52×
- Lisa J. Kane v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-10-30· cited 45×
- Johnathon I. Carter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-10· cited 45×
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-30· cited 41×
- Randolph v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-10· cited 41×
- Arnold Winters v. Charles Miller, SuperintendentSeventh Circuit· 2001-12-19· cited 40×
- Ham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-05-03· cited 36×
- Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-04· cited 30×
- Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-07-15· cited 27×
- Murray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-11-19· cited 26×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 474×
- State v. NesbitTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-28· cited 292×
- Alberty v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-04-20· cited 211×
- Bellmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 136×
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-01-06· cited 126×
- Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 105×
- United States v. Hector Martinez, Jorge Gomez, Humberto GalloEleventh Circuit· 1996-05-20· cited 102×
- Ex Parte ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama· 1998-05-15· cited 77×
- Pinkerton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-06-06· cited 74×
- Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-11-26· cited 71×
- Phillips v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-03-07· cited 67×
- United States v. Jose RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 1995-06-09· cited 62×
- Fleenor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-09-03· cited 58×
- United States v. Kenneth JohnsonThird Circuit· 1999-12-02· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-23· cited 55×
- Battle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-19· cited 54×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 51×
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 50×
- Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.