Fifth Circuit· 9/8/2003
Williams v. Kaufman County
Citations
- 352 F.3d 994
- 2003 WL 22890399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “any punitive damages-to-compensatory damages ‘ratio analysis’ cannot be applied effectively in cases where only nominal damages have been awarded”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Barksdale, Furgeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2009-08-28· cited 520×
- Club Retro, L.L.C. v. HiltonFifth Circuit· 2009-05-06· cited 380×
- Gates v. Texas Deparment of Protective & Regulatory ServicesFifth Circuit· 2008-07-31· cited 355×
- James v. Harris CountyFifth Circuit· 2009-08-04· cited 183×
- Jennings v. JonesFirst Circuit· 2007-08-17· cited 177×
- Jeffrey M. Kuha v. City of Minnetonka William Roth Kevin Anderson Dennis WaroshEighth Circuit· 2004-04-27· cited 133×
- Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court· 2007-03-12· cited 122×
- Hutchins v. McDanielsFifth Circuit· 2007-12-21· cited 95×
- Abner v. Kansas City Southern RailroadFifth Circuit· 2008-01-02· cited 65×
- Hampton Co. Nat. Sur., LLC v. Tunica County, Miss.Fifth Circuit· 2008-09-18· cited 57×
- Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-09-23· cited 55×
- Romanski v. Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C.Sixth Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 46×
- Elphage v. GautreauxM.D. Louisiana· 2013-09-03· cited 43×
- Romanski v. Detroit EntertainmentSixth Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 41×
- Villafranca v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2009-10-28· cited 36×
- Bearoff v. CratonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-24· cited 30×
- Wallace v. PoulosD. Maryland· 2012-03-22· cited 26×
- Broussard v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated GovernmentW.D. Louisiana· 2014-09-05· cited 23×
- Brown v. Board of Trustees Sealy Independent School DistrictS.D. Texas· 2012-05-09· cited 23×
- Bennett v. ReynoldsTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-12-21· cited 22×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 7,185×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 3,438×
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court· 1996-05-28· cited 2,781×
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 2,352×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 2,318×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 1,125×
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-05-14· cited 874×
- John Russell Webster, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Houston, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1984-08-09· cited 515×
- United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerFifth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 480×
- Williams v. BramerFifth Circuit· 1999-07-22· cited 340×
Other cases named Williams v. Kaufman County
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.