Skip to main content
First Circuit· 8/17/2007

Jennings v. Jones

Citations

  • 499 F.3d 2
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19583
  • 2007 WL 2339195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any disputed evidence on the question of the reasonableness of the force under the circumstances is a question for the jury
  • holding that where defendants press qualified immunity after a general jury verdict, the court is required to view facts relevant to qualified immunity deter- mination “in the light most favorable to the verdict”
  • holding that where defendants press qualified immunity after a general jury verdict, the court is required to view facts relevant to qualified immunity determination \in the light most favorable to the verdict\
  • holding that where defendants press qualified immunity after a general jury verdict, the court is required to view facts relevant to qualified immunity determination “in the light most favorable to the verdict”
  • holding that where defendants press qualified immunity after a general jury verdict, the court is required to view facts relevant to qualified immunity deter- mination “in the light most favorable to the verdict”
  • noting that common sense may be an appropriate basis for a finding of excessive force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Lynch, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jennings v. Jones

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.