Club Retro, L.L.C. v. Hilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers violated the Fourth Amendment during a raid by removing three individuals from a nightclub without probable cause
• Once the defendant raises a qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff carries the burden of demonstrating the inapplicability of qualified immunity.
• “And, in all cases, the Fourth Amendment’s -10- reasonableness requirement applies to government officials conducting administrative inspections of private commercial property.”
• alcohol control ordinance permitting administrative search of bar did not justify mass raid to search for narcotics
• defendant officers offered four alternative bases for arrest supported by probable cause
• quotation marks and 1 Hernandez does not assert a claim under the Texas Whistleblower Act against the individual defendants in their individual capacities. (Docket Entry No. 21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).