Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing cases in which double-digit ratio awards were justified because of highly reprehensible conduct, including Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. v. Cooper Industries, Inc., 285 F.3d 1146, 1151-52 (9th Cir.2002) (ten-to-one ratio in stolen trade secrets case
• explaining seven statutory factors relevant to determining appropriate punitive damages award
• explaining seven statutory factors relevant to determining appropriate punitive damages award
• “The corporate form does not shield corporate officers or employees who commit torts on behalf of their employer from personal liability.”
• \The corporate form does not shield corporate officers or employees who commit torts on behalf of their employer from personal liability.\
• “[A]buse of the corporate form ma justify piercing the corporate veil even in the absence of a showing of instrumentality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).