Seltzer v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding subsequent amendment to punitive damages statute did not limit recovery for a claim that accrued prior to the amendment
• concluding subsequent amendment to punitive damages statute did not limit recovery for á claim that accrued prior to the amendment
• “[W]e reject the notion that a compensatory award for emotional distress upheld in one case is in any way relevant to the propriety or size of an emotional distress award in another case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).