William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of Investigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the context of an administrative forfeiture proceeding under the Tariff Act of 1930 “[b]ecause neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt,’ Houston mandates the prison mailbox rule’s applicability.”
• noting that rule does not apply where “statutory or regulatory schemes ... clearly required actual receipt by a specific date.”
• noting that the prison mailbox rule applies to contexts other than habeas petitions, including an action in which the plaintiff contested the administrative forfeiture of his personal property
• applying the prison-mailbox rule to ownership claims in administrative forfeiture proceed- ings because “neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt’”
• applying the prison mailbox rule where the applicable statute and regulations failed to “require ‘actual receipt’”
• applying the prison-mailbox rule to ownership claims in administrative forfeiture proceed- ings because “neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).