Third Circuit· 3/7/2003

William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of Investigation

Citations

322 F.3d 758
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4252
2003 WL 911485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that in the context of an administrative forfeiture proceeding under the Tariff Act of 1930 “[b]ecause neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt,’ Houston mandates the prison mailbox rule’s applicability.”
noting that rule does not apply where “statutory or regulatory schemes ... clearly required actual receipt by a specific date.”
noting that the prison mailbox rule applies to contexts other than habeas petitions, including an action in which the plaintiff contested the administrative forfeiture of his personal property
applying the prison-mailbox rule to ownership claims in administrative forfeiture proceed- ings because “neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt’”
applying the prison mailbox rule where the applicable statute and regulations failed to “require ‘actual receipt’”
applying the prison-mailbox rule to ownership claims in administrative forfeiture proceed- ings because “neither the statute nor the regulations require ‘actual receipt’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, McKEE, Scirica

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.