Pablo Fernandez v. Christopher Artuz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the petitioner’s state coram nobis motion was “properly filed” on the date he delivered it to prison authorities for mailing
• finding that the petitioner’s state coram nobis motion was “properly filed” on the date he delivered it to prison authorities for mailing
• finding that the petitioner’s state coram nobis motion was “properly filed” on the date he delivered it to prison authorities for mailing
• finding that the prison mailbox rule applied to a petitioner’s coram nobis petition
• applying “the federal mailbox rule to ascertain when a state petition is ‘properly filed’ for purposes of tolling the AEDPA statute of limitations”
• considering, for purposes of habeas corpus limitations period, state court conviction to be final 90 days after Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal where petitioner did not petition for certiorari from the Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).