Skip to main content
· 8/23/2005

Price v. Philpot

Citations

  • 420 F.3d 1158
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18050
  • 2005 WL 2010196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that prisoner’s submission is deemed “filed” when it’s given to prison authorities for mailing
  • explaining that a motion for reconsideration is treated as a 59(e) motion if it is filed within Rule 59’s filing deadline
  • explaining that the prisoner has the burden to show compliance with the prison mailbox rule
  • noting that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not authorize a motion to reconsider but observing that such a motion may be construed “as a motion to reconsider under Rule 59, Rule 60(b), or as an interlocutory motion before any final judgment”
  • finding a document timely filed under the prison mailbox rule if given to prison officials prior to the filing deadline, regardless of when the Court receives the documents
  • noting district court expressly stated it considered the complaint, motions, and responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, McKay, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.