Skip to main content
· 7/10/2000

Kadonsky v. United States

Citations

  • 216 F.3d 499
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 72
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15836
  • 2000 WL 797243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Constitutionally ineffective notice renders forfeiture orders void because the court lacked jurisdiction to enter them.”
  • “unsupported assertion of ownership is insufficient to establish standing” to contest a forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Demoss, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.