· 7/10/2000
Kadonsky v. United States
Citations
- 216 F.3d 499
- 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 72
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15836
- 2000 WL 797243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Constitutionally ineffective notice renders forfeiture orders void because the court lacked jurisdiction to enter them.”
- “unsupported assertion of ownership is insufficient to establish standing” to contest a forfeiture
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.