Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. and Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title VII's 90-day time limitation is akin to a statute of limitations and thus is subject to equitable tolling
• holding that, generally, an attorney’s delinquency is chargeable to the client, although equitable tolling may be applied after consideration of the extent of any attorney misconduct, the diligence of the client, and prejudice to the defendant
• explaining that tolling may be appropriate “where a motion for appointment of counsel is pending”
• noting that plaintiff “appears to have been extremely diligent in pursuing her claim”
• noting that plaintiff “appears to have been extremely diligent in pursuing her claim”
• noting that courts exercise caution in using the equitable tolling doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).