Supreme Court· 6/8/1998
United States v. Beggerly
Citations
- 524 U.S. 38
- 118 S. Ct. 1862
- 141 L. Ed. 2d 32
- 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that fraud on the court that is “sufficiently gross” “demand[s] a departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata”
- holding that fraud on the court that is \sufficiently gross\ \demand[s] a departure from rigid adherence to the doctrine of res judicata\
- holding that equitable tolling is inconsistent with the text of a statute because the statute already accounted for equitable tolling
- holding that equitable tolling is inconsistent with the text of a statute because the statute already accounted for equitable tolling
- holding that equitable tolling does not apply to actions under the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, for reasons that could also apply to the FTCA
- holding that equitable tolling does not apply to actions under the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, for reasons that could also apply to the FTCA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rehnquist, Stevens, Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
276 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 3,974×
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalThird Circuit· 2005-04-15· cited 1,333×
- United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2003-04-25· cited 1,234×
- Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandFourth Circuit· 2000-04-04· cited 821×
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 738×
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 717×
- Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court· 2013-01-22· cited 544×
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-03-04· cited 393×
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 365×
- Turner v. PleasantFifth Circuit· 2011-11-23· cited 357×
- Sandvik v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1999-06-15· cited 352×
- Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesFederal Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 267×
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-04· cited 258×
- Harold E. Bailey, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsFederal Circuit· 1998-11-09· cited 231×
- Santos Ex Rel. Beato v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-03-11· cited 206×
- Solomon v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2006-11-02· cited 180×
- Chung v. U.S. Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 2003-07-08· cited 163×
- United States v. TorresTenth Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 157×
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeNinth Circuit· 2013-10-09· cited 157×
- United States v. BuckTenth Circuit· 2002-03-08· cited 150×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 1,009×
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court· 1985-04-01· cited 836×
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 489×
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court· 1891-11-09· cited 289×
- Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court· 1884-05-05· cited 111×
- Zimmern v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1936-04-27· cited 78×
- Chris W. Beggerly James R. Beggerly Clark M. Beggerly Velma B. Garner Suzanne Reed David Reed v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 8×
Other cases named United States v. Beggerly
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.