Wilhelmus v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that in a prosecution for manufacturing methamphetamine, evidence of Wilhelmus’s past involvement in manufacturing methamphetamine was relevant to establish identity
• affirming granting of fourteen-day continuance to State under Criminal Rule 4(D
• no abuse of discretion in granting Rule 4(D) motion; among other unavailable evidence, the lab needed more time to decrypt computer files
• relying on Ingram, 718 N.E.2d at 381

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).