Skip to main content

Ramsey v. State

Citations

  • 853 N.E.2d 491
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1794
  • 2006 WL 2521460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an admonishment to ignore a detective’s comment about the defendant’s possible involvement in a federal drug conspiracy was presumed to correct any error, and a mistrial was not warranted
  • holding comment made during closing argument was permissible comment on the evidence and not prosecutorial misconduct
  • holding comment made during closing argument was permissible comment on the evidence and not prosecutorial misconduct
  • explaining that any alleged misconduct from the prosecutor’s statements was cured by the trial court’s instructions to the jury regarding the burden of proof and the fact that the defendant was not required to present any evidence
  • where both the informant and the detective testified, “the jury was able to determine for itself whether there were sufficient controls in place during the buys”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.