Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/20/2005
Muncy v. State
Citations
- 834 N.E.2d 215
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1750
- 2005 WL 2277172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the erroneous admission of weapons was harmless error where testimony about the weapons was already admitted and not challenged
- “Muncy did not object on Sixth Amendment grounds during his sentencing hearing and thereby ‘forfeited [his] ability to appeal [his] sentence on Blakely grounds.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crone, Najam, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 272×
- West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-09-24· cited 68×
- Lycan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-09-25· cited 34×
- Wilhelmus v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-23· cited 30×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-12-08· cited 17×
- Freeze v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-18· cited 16×
- Gornick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-08-17· cited 9×
- Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-07· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.