· 11/6/2006
Truax v. State
Citations
- 856 N.E.2d 116
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2264
- 2006 WL 3162353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, because the defendant did not raise his challenge to the charging information until after the omnibus date, his argument that the information was defective was waived
- noting that failure to timely file a motion to dismiss an allegedly defective information waives the issue unless fundamental error occurs
- charging informations adequately apprised defendant of charges against him and did not constitute fundamental error
- Mr. Brumley’s testimony describing text from Cook stating that “a pole barn was going to look nice on her property, after she owns our house and bulldozes it to the ground”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Vaidik, Crone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.