Skip to main content
· 11/6/2006

Truax v. State

Citations

  • 856 N.E.2d 116
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2264
  • 2006 WL 3162353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because the defendant did not raise his challenge to the charging information until after the omnibus date, his argument that the information was defective was waived
  • noting that failure to timely file a motion to dismiss an allegedly defective information waives the issue unless fundamental error occurs
  • charging informations adequately apprised defendant of charges against him and did not constitute fundamental error
  • Mr. Brumley’s testimony describing text from Cook stating that “a pole barn was going to look nice on her property, after she owns our house and bulldozes it to the ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Vaidik, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.