Skip to main content

Poore v. State

Citations

  • 685 N.E.2d 36
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 124
  • 1997 WL 552184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the text of Rule 4(B) and holding that the phrase \held in jail on an indictment or affidavit\ as used in Rule 4(B) \(allthough not entirely without ambiguity ... clearly contemplates a defendant in custody on a pending criminal charge\) (emphasis added
  • discussing the text of Rule 4(B) and holding that the phrase “held in jail on an indictment or affidavit” as used in Rule 4(B) “[ajlthough not entirely without ambiguity ... clearly contemplates a defendant in custody on a pending criminal charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.