Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• drawing reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving 24 party on a motion to dismiss
• “Arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence lacking in the record.”
• describing remedies available for ongoing and future infringement
• noting “mathe- matical precision is not required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-09-21· cited 236×
• Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-12-04· cited 231×
• Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-12-07· cited 164×
• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-10-07· cited 124×
• Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2018-01-12· cited 120×
• Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-03-20· cited 106×
• The Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemicals Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2015-08-28· cited 85×
• Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-08-01· cited 66×
• Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor Company
  Federal Circuit· 2018-11-19· cited 49×
• Polara Engineering Inc v. Campbell Company
  Federal Circuit· 2018-07-10· cited 36×
• Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-03-06· cited 35×
• Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS, LLC
  W.D. Michigan· 2013-08-19· cited 28×
• The Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemicals Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2015-12-17· cited 27×
• Mlc Intellectual Property LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2021-08-26· cited 25×
• Amini Innovation Corp. v. McFerran Home Furnishings, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2014-07-09· cited 21×
• Sionyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
  Federal Circuit· 2020-12-07· cited 18×
• Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association
  Federal Circuit· 2022-05-20· cited 12×
• Ecofactor, Inc. v. Google LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2025-05-21· cited 12×
• 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-07-26· cited 11×
• Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2023-10-16· cited 9×

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Landgraf v. USI Film Products
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
• Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 1,967×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1,413×
• Hormel v. Helvering
  Supreme Court· 1941-03-17· cited 1,393×
• Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
• United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 1,163×
• Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 915×
• Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 825×
• Bilski v. Kappos
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 573×
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
• Diamond v. Diehr
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
• General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 494×
• Nimely v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 493×
• Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 489×
• The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg Division
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-23· cited 453×
• Rezi P. Forshey, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 2002-04-01· cited 453×
• Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 418×
• Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-24· cited 390×