Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim construc- tion argument was not forfeited or waived when consistent with arguments below
• determining that it was appropriate to use a prior license to gauge damages because it involved comparable technology and similarly situated companies
• noting that the district court did not err in declining to construe a term when the term was straightforward
• noting that the court did not err in declining to construe a term when the term was “straightforward”
• finding that even when expert’s “credibility, data, or factual assumptions have flaws, these flaws go to the weight of the evidence, not to its admissibility”
• noting that the fact that methodology is not peer-reviewed or published “does not necessitate its exclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).