Federal Circuit· 2/24/2006
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]
Citations
- 439 F.3d 1312
- 78 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1097
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5240
- 2006 WL 435838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \mere statements of disagreement ... do not amount to a developed argument\ sufficient to preserve the issue
- holding that \mere statements of disagreement ... do not amount to a developed argument\ sufficient to preserve the issue
- holding that when a party provides no developed argu- ment on a point, we treat that argument as waived
- holding that undeveloped arguments are waived and collecting cases that have held the same
- concluding that “mere statements of disagreement” do not “amount to a developed argument”
- holding that “ ‘[w]hen a party includes no developed argumentation on a point ... we treat the argument as waived’ ” (quoting Anderson v. City of Bos., 375 F.3d 71, 91 (1st Cir. 2004))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Schall, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
233 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesThird Circuit· 2013-01-23· cited 332×
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLCFederal Circuit· 2008-01-25· cited 198×
- Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Federal Circuit· 2010-11-04· cited 195×
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 174×
- Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2017-04-28· cited 152×
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Federal Circuit· 2008-08-18· cited 139×
- Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-08-20· cited 139×
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-15· cited 136×
- Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 132×
- Melissa K. Little v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 130×
- Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-04-04· cited 113×
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2008-09-25· cited 111×
- Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 100×
- Fresenius Usa, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-10· cited 99×
- Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-04-28· cited 89×
- Rodriguez v. DVAFederal Circuit· 2021-08-12· cited 87×
- Z4 Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Federal Circuit· 2007-11-16· cited 84×
- Flores v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesFederal Claims· 2014-03-21· cited 81×
- United States v. Great American InsuranceFederal Circuit· 2013-12-27· cited 80×
- Australian Therapeutic v. Naked Tm, LLCFederal Circuit· 2020-07-27· cited 79×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
- United States v. James C. DunkelSeventh Circuit· 1991-03-08· cited 1,563×
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 619×
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 612×
- Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Third Circuit· 1991-11-21· cited 436×
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court· 1938-05-23· cited 344×
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-09-30· cited 260×
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1990-12-13· cited 257×
- United States v. ElderSixth Circuit· 1996-09-18· cited 242×
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court· 1877-04-23· cited 184×
- Helifix Limited v. Blok-Lok, Ltd. And William Scott Burns v. Helifix North America Corporation, Third Party CounterclaimThird Circuit· 2000-04-07· cited 166×
- General Electric Company v. Nintendo Company, Ltd. And Nintendo of America, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-06-02· cited 149×
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.Federal Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 127×
- Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-03-11· cited 106×
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp.Federal Circuit· 2005-01-14· cited 92×
- Graphic Controls Corporation v. Utah Medical Products, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 85×
- Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 79×
- Anderson Ex Rel. Dowd v. City of BostonFirst Circuit· 2004-07-12· cited 48×
- In Re Donald H. ThorpeFederal Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.