United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court had authority, after ordering supplemental briefing, to decide the validity of a statutory section despite the parties' failure to dispute it
• holding that this court had authority, after ordering supplemental briefing, to decide the validity of a statutory section despite the parties’ failure to dispute it
• holding that a statute's punctuation may be disregarded where necessary to enforce congressional intent, and concluding that the quotation marks there at issue were misplaced
• holding that a court renders an advisory opinion when there is no justiciable case or controversy under Article III
• holding that “the Court of Appeals acted without any impropriety in refusing to accept what in effect was a stipulation on a question of law”
• holding that parties may not, “by agreeing on the legal issue presented,” prevent a court from considering the validity of the law governing the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).