· 5/15/1974
Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond
Citations
- 416 U.S. 696
- 94 S. Ct. 2006
- 40 L. Ed. 2d 476
- 1974 U.S. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, in some circumstances, “[t]o delay a fee award until the entire litigation is concluded” may be to “work substantial hardship on plaintiffs and their counsel”
- holding that the law in effect at the time of decision must be applied unless doing so would result in manifest injustice or there is a statutory directive to the contrary
- noting that the plaintiffs had brought the school board \into compliance with its constitutional mandate\
- noting that the plaintiffs had brought the school board “into compliance with its constitutional mandate”
- recognizing that, in some circumstances, “[t]o delay a fee award until the entire litigation is concluded” may be to “work substantial hardship on plaintiffs and their counsel”
- concluding that title I of 1984 Act applies to pending cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackmun, Marshall, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.