Skip to main content
· 5/15/1974

Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond

Citations

  • 416 U.S. 696
  • 94 S. Ct. 2006
  • 40 L. Ed. 2d 476
  • 1974 U.S. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, in some circumstances, “[t]o delay a fee award until the entire litigation is concluded” may be to “work substantial hardship on plaintiffs and their counsel”
  • holding that the law in effect at the time of decision must be applied unless doing so would result in manifest injustice or there is a statutory directive to the contrary
  • noting that the plaintiffs had brought the school board \into compliance with its constitutional mandate\
  • noting that the plaintiffs had brought the school board “into compliance with its constitutional mandate”
  • recognizing that, in some circumstances, “[t]o delay a fee award until the entire litigation is concluded” may be to “work substantial hardship on plaintiffs and their counsel”
  • concluding that title I of 1984 Act applies to pending cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Marshall, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.