· 9/2/1998
Elvik v. State
Citations
- 965 P.2d 281
- 114 Nev. 883
- 1998 Nev. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prohibit the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding with specificity
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
- explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.