Skip to main content
· 9/2/1998

Elvik v. State

Citations

  • 965 P.2d 281
  • 114 Nev. 883
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prohibit the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding with specificity
  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity
  • explaining that arguments made for the first time in a reply brief prevent the respondent from responding to appellant's contentions with specificity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.