Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 784 N.E.2d 584
  • 2003 WL 1083171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining issue is appropriately framed as challenge to admission of evidence at trial when defendant objected at trial and appeals from a completed trial, even though defendant filed a pre-trial motion to suppress
  • explaining issue is appropriately framed as challenge to admission of evidence at trial when defendant objected at trial and appeals from a completed trial, even though defendant filed a pre-trial motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.