Skip to main content
· 12/21/2000

Huffines v. State

Citations

  • 739 N.E.2d 1093
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 2057
  • 2000 WL 1863394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the fact that the search did not violate the statue does not address Huffines’ separate constitutional arguments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Najam, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.