Skip to main content

Barrett v. State

Citations

  • 837 N.E.2d 1022
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2178
  • 2005 WL 3164637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that failure to put forth a cogent argument acts as a waiver of the issue on appeal
  • noting that failure to set forth a cogent argument waives the issue on appeal
  • “We will not become a party’s advocate, nor will we address arguments that are inappropriate, improperly expressed, or too poorly developed to be understood.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Darden, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.