Skip to main content
· 2/28/2007

Widduck v. State

Citations

  • 861 N.E.2d 1267
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 355
  • 2007 WL 602472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the inventory search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, in part, because “the record before [the court was] devoid of any indicia of pretext or subterfuge for general rummaging”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Kirsch, Sharpnack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.