· 2/28/2007
Widduck v. State
Citations
- 861 N.E.2d 1267
- 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 355
- 2007 WL 602472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the inventory search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, in part, because “the record before [the court was] devoid of any indicia of pretext or subterfuge for general rummaging”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathias, Kirsch, Sharpnack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.