Indiana Court of Appeals· 1/9/2007

Ware v. State

Citations

859 N.E.2d 708
2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 4
2007 WL 46069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that if a continuance would cure harm caused by State failing to provide timely discovery, defendant must request continuance or claim of error in admitting evidence is waived
holding there was sufficient evidence of intent to kill where defendant fired gun at group of fleeing boys and said he was “going to get” them
affirming a defendant’s criminal recklessness conviction where the evidence revealed that the defendant shot at a group of boys
finding no prejudice with respect to an alleged discovery violation where the defendant’s defense was not substantially affected and the evidence would not have assisted with any other line of defense
stating “[t]he amount of evidence necessary to meet the probable cause requirement . . . is determined on a case-by-case basis, and is less than the level of proof necessary to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”
“[A] probable cause affidavit must include all material facts, which are those facts that ‘cast doubt on the existence of probable cause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Bailey, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.