Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 9/26/2006

Warner v. State

Citations

2006 OK CR 40
144 P.3d 838
2006 WL 2788641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that failure to object to jury instruction waives all but plain error review
holding that failure to object to jury instruction waives all but plain error review
holding invited comments which do no more than respond substantially in order to right the scale, do not warrant reversing a conviction
holding invited comments which do no more than respond substantially in order to right the scale, do not warrant reversing a conviction
finding that where record does not set out Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol, an appellant's claim of Eighth Amendment violation based on reference to pancuronium bromide and \two other\ drugs and supported by newspaper articles is speculative \at best\
finding that where record does not set out Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol, an appellant's claim of Eighth Amendment violation based on reference to pancuronium bromide and \two other\ drugs and supported by newspaper articles is speculative \at best\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Vice-Presiding, Johnson, Chapel, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

207 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.