Tenth Circuit· 12/27/2018

Simpson v. Carpenter

Citations

912 F.3d 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing a state court’s “prejudice determination under AEDPA’s and Strickland’s doubly deferential standard of review”
discussing standard for determining whether petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing in cases when § 2254(d) and § 2254(e)(2) do not apply
finding no deficient performance arising from failure to object 16 to correct jury instruction
“Generally speaking, federal habeas review ‘is “limited to the record that was before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits.”’ [Citation omitted.]”.
“Generally speaking, federal habeas review ‘is “limited to the record that was before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits.”’ [Citation omitted].”
“The petitioner bears the burden of showing a claim was not adjudicated on the merits in state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Lucero, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

123 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Simpson v. Carpenter

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.